Files
wrkflw/crates/executor
bahdotsh 7005e7e592 fix(executor): filter empty podman entrypoint and extract NativeDocker step handler
The podman runtime was happily passing `--entrypoint ""` to podman
when a workflow set `with.entrypoint: ""`, while Docker correctly
filtered it out via `.filter(|s| !s.is_empty())`. So the two
runtimes silently diverged on empty entrypoint behavior. Not great.

Add the same filter to podman's entrypoint handling so both
runtimes treat empty strings as "use the image default."

While at it, extract the ~90-line NativeDocker match arm from
execute_step into its own `execute_native_docker_step` function.
That match block was getting unwieldy, and this keeps each action
type's execution logic self-contained.

Also drop a TODO on the in-memory tar buffer in build_image_inner —
it holds the entire build context in a Vec<u8>, which gets
uncomfortable as repos approach the 500 MB cap.
2026-04-02 10:20:04 +05:30
..

wrkflw-executor

The execution engine that runs GitHub Actions workflows locally (Docker, Podman, or emulation).

  • Features:
    • Job graph execution with needs ordering and parallelism
    • Docker/Podman container steps and emulation mode
    • Basic environment/context wiring compatible with Actions
  • Used by: wrkflw CLI and TUI

API sketch

use wrkflw_executor::{execute_workflow, ExecutionConfig, RuntimeType};

let cfg = ExecutionConfig {
    runtime: RuntimeType::Docker,
    verbose: true,
    preserve_containers_on_failure: false,
};

// Path to a workflow YAML
let workflow_path = std::path::Path::new(".github/workflows/ci.yml");

let result = execute_workflow(workflow_path, cfg).await?;
println!("workflow status: {:?}", result.summary_status);

Prefer using the wrkflw binary for a complete UX across validation, execution, and logs.