* [WEB-8283] fix: bind Spaces board object IDs to the anchor's project The public Spaces board endpoints resolved the DeployBoard from the URL anchor but trusted the caller-supplied issue_id/comment_id/intake_id verbatim, without verifying the object belonged to that board's project/workspace. Any authenticated user could write comments, reactions and votes onto arbitrary issues cross-tenant, and read EXTERNAL comments from a different project in the same workspace. Bind every caller-supplied object id to the board's project + workspace before writing: - comment / issue-reaction / vote create: require the issue to exist in the board's project via Issue.issue_objects (excludes draft/archived/ triage), else 404. - comment-reaction create: require the comment to exist in the board's project with access="EXTERNAL", else 404. - intake create: require the URL intake_id to match the board's intake, else 400. - comment list read: scope the queryset to the board's project_id. Also add the missing is_votes_enabled gate on vote create for parity with comment/reaction create (pre-existing gap in the same method). Adds contract regression tests (fail-before verified): cross-tenant writes and the cross-project comment read now rejected, with positive controls confirming legitimate board writes/reads still succeed. Co-authored-by: Plane AI <noreply@plane.so> * [WEB-8283] test: address Copilot review — cross-workspace + votes-disabled coverage - Add cross-workspace write test (issue in a different workspace) to exercise the workspace_id binding, matching the advisory's cross-tenant impact (previously only same-workspace/different-project was covered). - Add a regression test for the new is_votes_enabled gate on vote create (votes-disabled board → 400), preventing the pre-existing gap from reappearing. - Clarify the section header comment: cross-tenant writes return 404 for issue/comment binding, 400 for the intake binding mismatch. Co-authored-by: Plane AI <noreply@plane.so> * [WEB-8283] refactor: extract board-scope guards into shared helpers Address CodeRabbit review: the identical "object belongs to the board's project+workspace" existence check was duplicated across four create() methods (in four different ViewSets). Extract two module-level helpers — _issue_in_board_scope and _comment_in_board_scope — so the check is a single source of truth and cannot drift between endpoints or be forgotten on a new one (the exact class of bug this PR fixes). Behavior-preserving; 14 contract tests still green. Co-authored-by: Plane AI <noreply@plane.so> * chore(security): drop advisory identifiers from code comments Explanations kept unchanged; only the IDs are removed. Co-authored-by: Plane AI <noreply@plane.so> * fix(security): use the deploy board's project_id in the reaction-create activity log CommentReactionPublicViewSet.create() logged the activity with str(self.kwargs.get("project_id", None)) — this route's URL only ever supplies anchor and comment_id, never project_id, so every comment reaction created on a public board logged project_id="None", silently corrupting the activity/audit trail. destroy() on the same viewset already resolves the correct project_id from the deploy board; create() now does the same. Co-authored-by: Plane AI <noreply@plane.so> * [WEB-8283] fix: apply board-scope guards to comment/reaction read, update and delete paths The board/issue/external-comment scoping added by this PR's create() methods was never applied to the list, update and delete paths built on the same models. A caller could read reactions on an INTERNAL (non-public) comment through the public reaction list, or reach a comment or reaction they authored through a board it doesn't actually belong to via partial_update() or destroy(), since those methods looked up objects by pk/actor only. Bind IssueCommentPublicViewSet.partial_update()/destroy() to the board's project, workspace, issue_id and EXTERNAL access; bind IssueReactionPublicViewSet.destroy() to the board's project (previously only workspace-scoped); and bind CommentReactionPublicViewSet.get_queryset()/ destroy() to EXTERNAL comments only. Add regression coverage for each gap, plus positive controls confirming legitimate reads/writes on the board's own objects still work. Co-authored-by: Plane AI <noreply@plane.so> --------- Co-authored-by: Plane AI <noreply@plane.so>
Modern project management for all teams
Website • Forum • X • Documentation
Meet Plane, an open-source project management tool to track issues, run sprints cycles, and manage product roadmaps without the chaos of managing the tool itself. 🧘♀️
Plane is evolving every day. Your suggestions, ideas, and reported bugs help us immensely. Do not hesitate to join in the conversation on Forum or raise a GitHub issue. We read everything and respond to most.
🚀 Installation
Getting started with Plane is simple. Choose the setup that works best for you:
-
Plane Cloud Sign up for a free account on Plane Cloud—it's the fastest way to get up and running without worrying about infrastructure.
-
Self-host Plane Prefer full control over your data and infrastructure? Install and run Plane on your own servers. Follow our detailed deployment guides to get started.
| Installation methods | Docs link |
|---|---|
| Docker | |
| Kubernetes |
Instance admins can configure instance settings with God mode.
🌟 Features
-
Work Items Efficiently create and manage tasks with a robust rich text editor that supports file uploads. Enhance organization and tracking by adding sub-properties and referencing related issues.
-
Cycles Maintain your team’s momentum with Cycles. Track progress effortlessly using burn-down charts and other insightful tools.
-
Modules Simplify complex projects by dividing them into smaller, manageable modules.
-
Views Customize your workflow by creating filters to display only the most relevant issues. Save and share these views with ease.
-
Pages Capture and organize ideas using Plane Pages, complete with AI capabilities and a rich text editor. Format text, insert images, add hyperlinks, or convert your notes into actionable items.
-
Analytics Access real-time insights across all your Plane data. Visualize trends, remove blockers, and keep your projects moving forward.
🛠️ Local development
See CONTRIBUTING
⚙️ Built with
📸 Screenshots
📝 Documentation
Explore Plane's product documentation and developer documentation to learn about features, setup, and usage.
❤️ Community
Join the Plane community on GitHub Discussions and our Forum. We follow a Code of conduct in all our community channels.
Feel free to ask questions, report bugs, participate in discussions, share ideas, request features, or showcase your projects. We’d love to hear from you!
🛡️ Security
If you discover a security vulnerability in Plane, please report it responsibly instead of opening a public issue. We take all legitimate reports seriously and will investigate them promptly. See Security policy for more info.
To disclose any security issues, please email us at security@plane.so.
🤝 Contributing
There are many ways you can contribute to Plane:
- Report bugs or submit feature requests.
- Review the documentation and submit pull requests to improve it—whether it's fixing typos or adding new content.
- Talk or write about Plane or any other ecosystem integration and let us know!
- Show your support by upvoting popular feature requests.
Please read CONTRIBUTING.md for details on the process for submitting pull requests to us.
Repo activity
We couldn't have done this without you.
License
This project is licensed under the GNU Affero General Public License v3.0.