* fix: enforce features.direct_tool_servers on chat-completion tool_servers
The features.direct_tool_servers per-user permission was correctly
enforced on the storage path (routers/users.py user/settings/update,
which strips toolServers from saved settings when the caller lacks the
permission), but the inference path (/api/chat/completions) popped
tool_servers straight from the request body into metadata with no
permission check. The middleware (utils/middleware.py:2799) then
consumed direct_tool_servers to inject system_prompt into the message
array and register external tool specs that get invoked during the
completion. End result: any authenticated user could bypass the
admin-set per-user feature toggle and use inline tool_servers in their
chat-completion requests, even when admin had explicitly denied the
permission.
Default for USER_PERMISSIONS_FEATURES_DIRECT_TOOL_SERVERS is False
(config.py:2750), so under default config no regular user is supposed
to be able to use direct tool servers — making this a real boundary
bypass on out-of-the-box deployments rather than a corner case.
Mirror the storage-side behaviour at the inference entry point: pop
tool_servers from the request body, then silently drop the value if
the caller is non-admin and lacks features.direct_tool_servers. Admins
always pass; users with the explicit grant always pass; everyone else
gets None propagated into metadata, which the middleware already
handles as the no-tool-servers case.
Reported by berkant-koc in GHSA-f582-c373-jjf6.
Co-authored-by: berkant-koc <berkant-koc@users.noreply.github.com>
* chore: trim verbose comment on tool_servers permission check
---------
Co-authored-by: berkant-koc <berkant-koc@users.noreply.github.com>
POST /api/v1/chats/new and POST /api/v1/chats/{id}/folder accepted a
caller-supplied folder_id with no validation — neither ownership, nor
existence, nor UUID format. The row was persisted with the supplied
value verbatim, so the DB ended up with chat rows whose folder_id
referenced another user's folder, a non-existent UUID, or even a
non-UUID string.
No read path surfaces this across users — every chat-folder read is
user_id-filtered on both sides — so this is referential-integrity
hardening rather than a security boundary fix. But there's no reason
to accept dangling references either, and the downstream consumers
shouldn't have to assume the column is clean.
Add a Folders.get_folder_by_id_and_user_id() lookup at both writers:
if a folder_id is supplied, it must match a folder owned by the
caller. None remains allowed (chat-without-folder is the default).
Non-existent and non-UUID values fall through to 404.
Reported by ShigekiTsuchiyama in GHSA-4vrg-2vcq-q7jc.
Co-authored-by: ShigekiTsuchiyama <ShigekiTsuchiyama@users.noreply.github.com>
