Files
PowerToys/.github/prompts/review-pr.prompt.md
Gordon Lam 6661adbd5c chore(prompts): add fix active PR comments prompt with scoped changes (#44996)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Enhance the active PR comments prompt to allow for scoped changes while
removing outdated model references from various prompt files.

## PR Checklist
- [ ] **Communication:** I've discussed this with core contributors
already. If the work hasn't been agreed, this work might be rejected
- [ ] **Tests:** Added/updated and all pass
- [ ] **Localization:** All end-user-facing strings can be localized
- [ ] **Dev docs:** Added/updated
- [ ] **Documentation updated:** If checked, please file a pull request
on [our docs
repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/windows-uwp/tree/docs/hub/powertoys)
and link it here: #xxx

## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
The changes include the addition of a new prompt for fixing active PR
comments with scoped changes, ensuring that only simple fixes are
applied. Additionally, references to the model 'GPT-5.1-Codex-Max' have
been removed from several prompt files to streamline the prompts.

## Validation Steps Performed
Manual validation of the new prompt functionality was conducted to
ensure it correctly identifies and resolves active PR comments.
```
2026-01-26 20:34:11 -08:00

198 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
---
agent: 'agent'
description: 'Perform a comprehensive PR review with per-step Markdown and machine-readable outputs'
---
# Review Pull Request
**Goal**: Given `{{pr_number}}`, run a *one-topic-per-step* review. Write files to `Generated Files/prReview/{{pr_number}}/` (replace `{{pr_number}}` with the integer). Emit machinereadable blocks for a GitHub MCP to post review comments.
## PR selection
Resolve the target PR using these fallbacks in order:
1. Parse the invocation text for an explicit identifier (first integer following patterns such as a leading hash and digits or the text `PR:` followed by digits).
2. If no PR is found yet, locate the newest `Generated Files/prReview/_batch/batch-overview-*.md` file (highest timestamp in filename, fallback newest mtime) and take the first entry in its `## PRs` list whose review folder is missing `00-OVERVIEW.md` or contains `__error.flag`.
3. If the batch file has no pending PRs, query assignments with `gh pr list --assignee @me --state open --json number,updatedAt --limit 20` and pick the most recently updated PR that does not already have a completed review folder.
4. If still unknown, run `gh pr view --json number` in the current branch and use that result when it is unambiguous.
5. If every step above fails, prompt the user for a PR number before proceeding.
## Fetch PR data with `gh`
- `gh pr view {{pr_number}} --json number,baseRefName,headRefName,baseRefOid,headRefOid,changedFiles,files`
- `gh api repos/:owner/:repo/pulls/{{pr_number}}/files?per_page=250` # patches for line mapping
### Incremental review workflow
1. **Check for existing review**: Read `Generated Files/prReview/{{pr_number}}/00-OVERVIEW.md`
2. **Extract state**: Parse `Last reviewed SHA:` from review metadata section
3. **Detect changes**: Run `Get-PrIncrementalChanges.ps1 -PullRequestNumber {{pr_number}} -LastReviewedCommitSha {{sha}}`
4. **Analyze result**:
- `NeedFullReview: true` → Review all files in the PR
- `NeedFullReview: false` and `IsIncremental: true` → Review only files in `ChangedFiles` array
- `ChangedFiles` is empty → No changes, skip review (update iteration history with "No changes since last review")
5. **Apply smart filtering**: Use the file patterns in smart step filtering table to skip irrelevant steps
6. **Update metadata**: After completing review, save current `headRefOid` as `Last reviewed SHA:` in `00-OVERVIEW.md`
### Reusable PowerShell scripts
Scripts live in `.github/review-tools/` to avoid repeated manual approvals during PR reviews:
| Script | Usage |
| --- | --- |
| `.github/review-tools/Get-GitHubRawFile.ps1` | Download a repository file at a given ref, optionally with line numbers. |
| `.github/review-tools/Get-GitHubPrFilePatch.ps1` | Fetch the unified diff for a specific file within a pull request via `gh api`. |
| `.github/review-tools/Get-PrIncrementalChanges.ps1` | Compare last reviewed SHA with current PR head to identify incremental changes. Returns JSON with changed files, new commits, and whether full review is needed. |
| `.github/review-tools/Test-IncrementalReview.ps1` | Test helper to preview incremental review detection for a PR. Use before running full review to see what changed. |
Always prefer these scripts (or new ones added under `.github/review-tools/`) over raw `gh api` or similar shell commands so the review flow does not trigger interactive approval prompts.
## Output files
Folder: `Generated Files/prReview/{{pr_number}}/`
Files: `00-OVERVIEW.md`, `01-functionality.md`, `02-compatibility.md`, `03-performance.md`, `04-accessibility.md`, `05-security.md`, `06-localization.md`, `07-globalization.md`, `08-extensibility.md`, `09-solid-design.md`, `10-repo-patterns.md`, `11-docs-automation.md`, `12-code-comments.md`, `13-copilot-guidance.md` *(only if guidance md exists).*
- **Write-after-step rule:** Immediately after completing each TODO step, persist that step's markdown file before proceeding to the next. Generate `00-OVERVIEW.md` only after every step file has been refreshed for the current run.
## Iteration management
- Determine the current review iteration by reading `00-OVERVIEW.md` (look for `Review iteration:`). If missing, assume iteration `1`.
- Extract the last reviewed SHA from `00-OVERVIEW.md` (look for `Last reviewed SHA:` in the review metadata section). If missing, this is iteration 1.
- **Incremental review detection**:
1. Call `.github/review-tools/Get-PrIncrementalChanges.ps1 -PullRequestNumber {{pr_number}} -LastReviewedCommitSha {{last_sha}}` to get delta analysis.
2. Parse the JSON result to determine if incremental review is possible (`IsIncremental: true`, `NeedFullReview: false`).
3. If force-push detected or first review, proceed with full review of all changed files.
4. If incremental, review only the files listed in `ChangedFiles` array and apply smart step filtering (see below).
- Increment the iteration for each review run and propagate the new value to all step files and the overview.
- Preserve prior iteration notes by keeping/expanding an `## Iteration history` section in each markdown file, appending the newest summary under `### Iteration <N>`.
- Summaries should capture key deltas since the previous iteration so reruns can pick up context quickly.
- **After review completion**, update `Last reviewed SHA:` in `00-OVERVIEW.md` with the current `headRefOid` and update the timestamp.
### Smart step filtering (incremental reviews only)
When performing incremental review, skip steps that are irrelevant based on changed file types:
| File pattern | Required steps | Skippable steps |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `**/*.cs`, `**/*.cpp`, `**/*.h` | Functionality, Compatibility, Performance, Security, SOLID, Repo patterns, Code comments | (depends on files) |
| `**/*.resx`, `**/Resources/*.xaml` | Localization, Globalization | Most others |
| `**/*.md` (docs) | Docs & automation | Most others (unless copilot guidance) |
| `**/*copilot*.md`, `.github/prompts/*.md` | Copilot guidance, Docs & automation | Most others |
| `**/*.csproj`, `**/*.vcxproj`, `**/packages.config` | Compatibility, Security, Repo patterns | Localization, Globalization, Accessibility |
| `**/UI/**`, `**/*View.xaml` | Accessibility, Localization | Performance (unless perf-sensitive controls) |
**Default**: If uncertain or files span multiple categories, run all applicable steps. When in doubt, be conservative and review more rather than less.
## TODO steps (one concern each)
1) Functionality
2) Compatibility
3) Performance
4) Accessibility
5) Security
6) Localization
7) Globalization
8) Extensibility
9) SOLID principles
10) Repo patterns
11) Docs & automation coverage for the changes
12) Code comments
13) Copilot guidance (conditional): if changed folders contain `*copilot*.md` or `.github/prompts/*.md`, review diffs **against** that guidance and write `13-copilot-guidance.md` (omit if none).
## Per-step file template (use verbatim)
```md
# <STEP TITLE>
**PR:** (populate with PR identifier) — Base:<baseRefName> Head:<headRefName>
**Review iteration:** ITERATION
## Iteration history
- Maintain subsections titled `### Iteration N` in reverse chronological order (append the latest at the top) with 24 bullet highlights.
### Iteration ITERATION
- <Latest key point 1>
- <Latest key point 2>
## Checks executed
- List the concrete checks for *this step only* (510 bullets).
## Findings
(If none, write **None**. Defaults have one or more blocks:)
```mcp-review-comment
{"file":"relative/path.ext","start_line":123,"end_line":125,"severity":"high|medium|low|info","tags":["<step-slug>","pr-tag-here"],"related_files":["optional/other/file1"],"body":"Problem → Why it matters → Concrete fix. If spans multiple files, name them here."}
```
Use the second tag to encode the PR number.
```
## Overview file (`00-OVERVIEW.md`) template
```md
# PR Review Overview — (populate with PR identifier)
**Review iteration:** ITERATION
**Changed files:** <n> | **High severity issues:** <count>
## Review metadata
**Last reviewed SHA:** <headRefOid from gh pr view>
**Last review timestamp:** <ISO8601 timestamp>
**Review mode:** <Full|Incremental (N files changed since iteration X)>
**Base ref:** <baseRefName>
**Head ref:** <headRefName>
## Step results
Write lines like: `01 Functionality — <OK|Issues|Skipped> (see 01-functionality.md)` … through step 13.
Mark steps as "Skipped" when using incremental review smart filtering.
## Iteration history
- Maintain subsections titled `### Iteration N` mirroring the per-step convention with concise deltas and cross-links to the relevant step files.
- For incremental reviews, list the specific files that changed and which commits were added.
```
## Line numbers & multifile issues
- Map headside lines from `patch` hunks (`@@ -a,b +c,d @@` → new lines `+c..+c+d-1`).
- For crossfile issues: set the primary `"file"`, list others in `"related_files"`, and name them in `"body"`.
## Posting (for MCP)
- Parse all ```mcp-review-comment``` blocks across step files and post as PR review comments.
- If posting isnt available, still write all files.
## Constraint
Read/analyze only; don't modify code. Keep comments small, specific, and fixoriented.
**Testing**: Use `.github/review-tools/Test-IncrementalReview.ps1 -PullRequestNumber 42374` to preview incremental detection before running full review.
## Scratch cache for large PRs
Create a local scratch workspace to progressively summarize diffs and reload state across runs.
### Paths
- Root: `Generated Files/prReview/{{pr_number}}/__tmp/`
- Files:
- `index.jsonl` — append-only JSON Lines index of artifacts.
- `todo-queue.json` — pending items (files/chunks/steps).
- `rollup-<step>-v<N>.md` — iterative per-step aggregates.
- `file-<hash>.txt` — optional saved chunk text (when needed).
### JSON schema (per line in `index.jsonl`)
```json
{"type":"chunk|summary|issue|crosslink",
"path":"relative/file.ext","chunk_id":"f-12","step":"functionality|compatibility|...",
"base_sha":"...", "head_sha":"...", "range":[start,end], "version":1,
"notes":"short text or key:value map", "created_utc":"ISO8601"}
```
### Phases (stateful; resume-safe)
0. **Discover** PR + SHAs: `gh pr view <PR> --json baseRefName,headRefName,baseRefOid,headRefOid,files`.
1. **Chunk** each changed file (head): split into ~300600 LOC or ~4k chars; stable `chunk_id` = hash(path+start).
- Save `chunk` records. Optionally write `file-<hash>.txt` for expensive chunks.
2. **Summarize** per chunk: intent, APIs, risks per TODO step; emit `summary` records (≤600 tokens each).
3. **Issues**: convert findings to machine-readable blocks and emit `issue` records (later rendered to step MD).
4. **Rollups**: build/update `rollup-<step>-v<N>.md` from `summary`+`issue`. Keep prior versions.
5. **Finalize**: write per-step files + `00-OVERVIEW.md` from rollups. Post comments via MCP if available.
### Re-use & token limits
- Always **reload** `index.jsonl` first; skip chunks with same `head_sha` and `range`.
- **Incremental review optimization**: When `Get-PrIncrementalChanges.ps1` returns a subset of changed files, load only chunks from those files. Reuse existing chunks/summaries for unchanged files.
- Prefer re-summarizing only changed chunks; merge chunk summaries → file summaries → step rollups.
- When context is tight, load only the minimal chunk text (or its saved `file-<hash>.txt`) needed for a comment.
### Original vs diff
- Fetch base content when needed: prefer `git show <baseRefName>:<path>`; fallback `gh api repos/:owner/:repo/contents/<path>?ref=<base_sha>` (base64).
- Use patch hunks from `gh api .../pulls/<PR>/files` to compute **head** line numbers.
### Queue-driven loop
- Seed `todo-queue.json` with all changed files.
- Process: chunk → summarize → detect issues → roll up.
- Append to `index.jsonl` after each step; never rewrite previous lines (append-only).
### Hygiene
- `__tmp/` is implementation detail; do not include in final artifacts.
- It is safe to delete to force a clean pass; the next run rebuilds it.