Updates for check-spelling v0.0.25 (#40386)

## Summary of the Pull Request

- #39572 updated check-spelling but ignored:
   > 🐣 Breaking Changes
[Code Scanning action requires a Code Scanning
Ruleset](https://github.com/check-spelling/check-spelling/wiki/Breaking-Change:-Code-Scanning-action-requires-a-Code-Scanning-Ruleset)
If you use SARIF reporting, then instead of the workflow yielding an ❌
when it fails, it will rely on [github-advanced-security
🤖](https://github.com/apps/github-advanced-security) to report the
failure. You will need to adjust your checks for PRs.

This means that check-spelling hasn't been properly doing its job 😦.

I'm sorry, I should have pushed a thing to this repo earlier,...

Anyway, as with most refreshes, this comes with a number of fixes, some
are fixes for typos that snuck in before the 0.0.25 upgrade, some are
for things that snuck in after, some are based on new rules in
spell-check-this, and some are hand written patterns based on running
through this repository a few times.

About the 🐣 **breaking change**: someone needs to create a ruleset for
this repository (see [Code Scanning action requires a Code Scanning
Ruleset: Sample ruleset

](https://github.com/check-spelling/check-spelling/wiki/Breaking-Change:-Code-Scanning-action-requires-a-Code-Scanning-Ruleset#sample-ruleset)).

The alternative to adding a ruleset is to change the condition to not
use sarif for this repository. In general, I think the github
integration from sarif is prettier/more helpful, so I think that it's
the better choice.

You can see an example of it working in:
- https://github.com/check-spelling-sandbox/PowerToys/pull/23

---------

Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Mike Griese <migrie@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Dustin L. Howett <dustin@howett.net>

src/settings-ui/Settings.UI.UnitTests/Mocks/IIOProviderMocks.cs

@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ namespace Microsoft.PowerToys.Settings.UI.UnitTests.Mocks
         /// This mock is specific to a given module, and is verifiable that the stub file was read.
         /// </summary>
         /// <param name="savePath">The path to the stub settings file</param>
-        /// <param name="filterExpression">The substring in the path that identifies the module eg. Microsoft\\PowerToys\\ColorPicker</param>
+        /// <param name="filterExpression">The substring in the path that identifies the module e.g. Microsoft\\PowerToys\\ColorPicker</param>
         /// <returns>Mocked IFile</returns>
         internal static Mock<IFile> GetMockIOReadWithStubFile(string savePath, Expression<Func<string, bool>> filterExpression)
         {

src/settings-ui/Settings.UI.UnitTests/Mocks/ISettingsUtilsMocks.cs

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ namespace Microsoft.PowerToys.Settings.UI.UnitTests.Mocks
 {
     internal static class ISettingsUtilsMocks
     {
-        // Stubs out empty values for imageresizersettings and general settings as needed by the imageresizer viewmodel
+        // Stubs out empty values for imageresizersettings and general settings as needed by the imageresizer view model
         internal static Mock<ISettingsUtils> GetStubSettingsUtils<T>()
             where T : ISettingsConfig, new()
         {