Updates for check-spelling v0.0.25 (#40386)

## Summary of the Pull Request

- #39572 updated check-spelling but ignored:
   > 🐣 Breaking Changes
[Code Scanning action requires a Code Scanning
Ruleset](https://github.com/check-spelling/check-spelling/wiki/Breaking-Change:-Code-Scanning-action-requires-a-Code-Scanning-Ruleset)
If you use SARIF reporting, then instead of the workflow yielding an ❌
when it fails, it will rely on [github-advanced-security
🤖](https://github.com/apps/github-advanced-security) to report the
failure. You will need to adjust your checks for PRs.

This means that check-spelling hasn't been properly doing its job 😦.

I'm sorry, I should have pushed a thing to this repo earlier,...

Anyway, as with most refreshes, this comes with a number of fixes, some
are fixes for typos that snuck in before the 0.0.25 upgrade, some are
for things that snuck in after, some are based on new rules in
spell-check-this, and some are hand written patterns based on running
through this repository a few times.

About the 🐣 **breaking change**: someone needs to create a ruleset for
this repository (see [Code Scanning action requires a Code Scanning
Ruleset: Sample ruleset

](https://github.com/check-spelling/check-spelling/wiki/Breaking-Change:-Code-Scanning-action-requires-a-Code-Scanning-Ruleset#sample-ruleset)).

The alternative to adding a ruleset is to change the condition to not
use sarif for this repository. In general, I think the github
integration from sarif is prettier/more helpful, so I think that it's
the better choice.

You can see an example of it working in:
- https://github.com/check-spelling-sandbox/PowerToys/pull/23

---------

Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Mike Griese <migrie@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Dustin L. Howett <dustin@howett.net>

src/modules/cmdpal/Microsoft.CmdPal.UI.ViewModels/ListViewModel.cs

@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ public partial class ListViewModel : PageViewModel, IDisposable
 
     protected override void OnFilterUpdated(string filter)
     {
-        //// TODO: Just temp testing, need to think about where we want to filter, as ACVS in View could be done, but then grouping need CVS, maybe we do grouping in view
+        //// TODO: Just temp testing, need to think about where we want to filter, as AdvancedCollectionView in View could be done, but then grouping need CollectionViewSource, maybe we do grouping in view
         //// and manage filtering below, but we should be smarter about this and understand caching and other requirements...
         //// Investigate if we re-use src\modules\cmdpal\extensionsdk\Microsoft.CommandPalette.Extensions.Toolkit\ListHelpers.cs InPlaceUpdateList and FilterList?